ER 6i from Etymotic Research - I can’t hear you! No, really, I can’t hear you!!

by David Parmet Feb 06, 2006

The digital music revolution means for me that I can carry everything I might ever want to listen to with me everywhere I go. More importantly, for those times where I don’t want to be bothered, I don’t have to pretend I can’t hear you because I can’t hear you.

In other words,I am pleased as punch to live at a time where I can carry around the complete works of Joy Division so I can avoid idle chit-chat on planes and trains.

So it struck me, the vast majority of headphone and earphone reviews focus on stuff like audio reproduction, fidelity, dBs (not the band) and bass response. But what I really want to know is will it block out the sounds coming from my kids bedrooms at bedtime?

To test the 6isolators under real world conditions, my lovely lab assistant (wife) put our two test subjects - AKA, my daughters, the twin princesses - into the bath and encouraged them to shout at the top of their lungs. They’re three, they know from screaming.

For this highly scientific test, I put on “Fine Time” from New Order’s Technique album. I am happy to report that in addition to Joy Division’s entire recorded output, I have most of New Order’s as well, on my iPod and ready for any emergency.

The first thing you notice is how deeply you have to put these things in your ear canal. The manual says get them in good, open your jaw, twist and turn them and get them in there until they seal against the sides of your ear canals. If the flanges are too big for your tiny ear canals, you can order smaller ones. Or larger if you care to admit to your overly large ear canals. At first it is a bit uncomfortable but with a bit of time, effort and practice, they get in there without a hitch and feel just fine. If the flanges aren’t a good fit, there’s a pair of foam plugs in the box to replace them with to get a tighter fit.

The second thing you notice is how much of your music you were missing. I discovered that there’s this barely audible warm ambient buzz under “Love Vigilantes” that I never noticed before. Maybe we weren’t meant to know what is going on way down at the bottom of New Order songs. Maybe that’s why Peter Hook plays his bass so high. He’s trying to divert our attention.

But I digress.

The next thing I noticed is that I heard nothing, and I mean nothing, aside from the music. It took a few minutes for me to realize the kids were shouting at me. Waving their arms and shouting and I didn’t hear a thing. A parent’s dream!

At that point my wife wanted to share in the joy. So we traded places. Oddly enough, no matter how deeply she shoved and twisted the ear phones in there, she could still hear the kids. So Eytmotic - time to work on a Mommy filter.

The main downside to these guys is they seem very delicate. I can’t verify if they are or aren’t because frankly I don’t want to pull them out from my ears to see if the cable comes off. But you have to be very careful in pulling them out. Carefully twist the earphones themselves and not the wires to break the seal and then gently pull them out.

If you are an audiophile - the kind of person who bores people to death with lectures on how mp3s don’t catch the full sonic quality of old LPs, ER 6i is for you. Even if you are a casual listener but want something better than the stock earbuds the iPod comes with, you’d benefit by stepping up and getting a pair. They are pricey ($149 at the Apple Store) but so was your iPod. So it’s worth the investment.

In addition to the earphones themselves, the box contains a pair of foam plugs if the flanges covering the earphones aren’t a perfect fit for you, as well as a set of replacement filters. There’s a neat little carrying case to put your earphones in when you are done and a hard plastic thingie to wrap the cord around so it isn’t flopping around.

Comments

  • sjonke,

    I own these headphones and use them all the time.  Are you using the rubber earpieces?  If so, they’re harder to get a good seal with.  If using the foam pieces properly, and new ones at that as the older ones lose the seal, you will get an airtight seal and will have significant bass, only rivaled by my Sony MDR-V700’s.  Poor highs and lack of bass are signs of poor seal and clipping signal.  Turn down the volume and verify the seal.

    If you’re certain you’re sealing them properly, they may not fit your ears with the regular inserts.  Try getting a set of the larger foam inserts and try them.  I don’t like the flange inserts because they don’t get me the same quality of a seal that I do with foam, even though they are reusable.

    iPod’s are more than capable of driving these headphones, because they are very high efficiency; they were made specifically for the iPod.

    Personally, I love these phones, both with my iBook and my iPod.  In fact, with these phones I can really tell how poor the fidelity is on the iBook sound card, so I’m going to be dropping $100 shortly for an M-Audio Transit as replacement.  For the price, these are the best phones I’ve ever used, and I do consider myself a very strong audio enthusiast, if not borderline audiophile.

    Let us know what Etymotic says about them.

    DJ_Mittens had this to say on Feb 24, 2006 Posts: 1
  • I did send in my ER6i’s and they sent me a new pair, but noted that they did not see any audio quality issue with the original ones, except for an intermittent plug. I hadn’t even seen the intermittent plug issue, so maybe that happened during shipping. In any case I tested out the new pair and… the audio quality is identical, which is pretty depressingly poor, at least to my ears. They sound very dead, especially in comparison to my Sennheiser PX-100 on-ear phones, which sound tremendously better in treble, bass and mids and have similar clarity if not better. But, because they are open-ear, they don’t block any ambient noise. I was considering the idea of getting one of those $60 headphone amps and trying that with the Etymotic phones, but now I’m considering Sennheiser’s new ear-canal phones, the CX 300’s. That will also cost me around $60 and I’m so happy with the sound of my Sennheiser PX-100’s that I’m more inclined to give their canal-phones a try than to buy the amp, perhaps only to find that the sound is louder, but not better, plus having to carry around the amp. The Sennheiser CX 300’s seem be getting good reviews too. Plus I like that they use the Sony-style silicon inserts. My old Sony canal-phones were pretty awful sounding, in a different way from the Etymotic’s (almost entirely bass and not much else), but they were very comfortable to wear, much more so than the ER-6i’s. I’m a little worried that they won’t block nearly as much ambient noise, but I’m still inclined to try them out.

    Let me note again that I tried all types and sizes of Etymotic inserts. None of them made a positive difference in sound, though some made it worse. I also extensively experimented with fit. I have them fit properly, or at least as properly as they can be in my ears, and the seal is excellent, blocking out a tremendous amount of ambient noise. I’ve also experimented with even lossless audio files ripped from CD. That format made no difference in sound quality with the ER-6i’s.

    I’m looking around for the best price on the CX 300’s. Unfortunately it looks like I missed out on an introductory price that was $40. Now they are around $60 to $70.

    sjonke had this to say on Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 12
  • Thanks for the CX 300 info, Steve.  Somehow that model (and the $40 sale) slipped through my radar.

    I like my PX-100’s (and HD 580’s, which still deserve a better amp than I can afford) although sometimes the ambient noise is too distracting.  The price/necessity ratio has kept me from trying in-ear phones but ~$50 for well-rated (helpful, when bias-filtered) Sennheiser’s gets my attention.

    Amazon’s got the CX 300B’s for $54 through Office Depot.  I always check there first because qualifying orders over $25 have free shipping, which almost always eliminates any competition and their sometimes outrageous shipping rates.  But Office Depot wants ~$10 for shipping+tax, killing any possible temptation of making an impulse purchase.  I’ll be watching for another sale.

    If you do get ‘em I hope you’ll share your impression even if I’m the only interested/curious person still here to read it. grin

    sjk had this to say on Mar 04, 2006 Posts: 112
  • I actually ordered my pair via an ebay “Buy Now” only sale. The price with shipping was $58.40, but I opted to pay $3 more to get priority mail shipping. It’s still cheaper than the Office Depot price, as you noted, after shipping and tax. Suppose to ship out on Monday. I’ll definitely report back on how they sound.

    sjonke had this to say on Mar 04, 2006 Posts: 12
  • This is just an initial opinion as I only got my Sennheiser CX 300’s yesterday. Also, I didn’t take the train today, so wasn’t able to test them in that environment. However I did test them out a bit at home. In short, these ear-canal phones do sound better than the Etymotic ER6i’s, but they are also far from perfect. Perhaps it is unfair to compare to on-the-ear, open-ear headphones such as the Sennheiser PX-100’s, but then the PX-100’s are relatively low end. The PX-100’s sound *much* better than the CX-300’s, which have a bit of a disjointed sound to them. The treble is there (albeit sounding a bit harsh - the ER6i’s have somewhat harsh treble too), the bass is there and the mids, but somehow they all seem slightly detached from each other. I’m not really sure how to describe it. Still, compared to the ER6i’s they are much more enjoyable to listen to. The bass is much stronger than the ER6i’s, but that isn’t difficult. Indeed, and unfortunately, it is too strong. Like the Sony’s, I get the impression they are boosting the bass within the headset, perhaps because people tend to complain about bass with this type of headset. Unfortunately the bass is overwhelming as a result and that’s definitely disappointing. They sound better if you set your iPod or equivalent to reduce bass mode (on the iPod, set the EQ to “reduce bass” but then also turn the volume up a bit as this setting also reduces volume slightly, and you might initially then think it sounds worse - give it a touch more volume and I think you’ll be pretty happy.) I wish they’d just made the bass normal. I don’t wish to harp too much on the sound quality, though, as definitely they are more satisfying than the ER6i’s, and they are cheaper, a bit more comfortable and less of a fuss too.

    I haven’t yet done a direct comparison to the Sony ear-canal phones, but from what I recall, the CX 300’s sound a lot better. The Sony’s are pretty much all bass and nothing else. The CX 300’s have over-boosted bass too, as noted, but the midrange and treble is there too.

    They are similar in design to the Sony ear-canal phones in that they use a thin, rounded, silicon insert that is comfortable, but does block less outside noise than the Etymotics. It still blocks a fair amount, but no where near as much as the Etymotics. On the other hand they seem a lot more tolerant with regard to fit -just jam them in and go. Also no fuss to take them out. I’ll see how they fair on the train tomorrow.

    It comes with three sizes of inserts. I found the large to be best for my ears. They are in no way near as large as the large foam inserts available (separately) for the ER6i’s, so if you need those, you may find even the largest CX 300 inserts too small. I’m wondering if there are a set of foam inserts that might fit the CX 300’s - it would be interesting to see how that affected their sound. I don’t think the inserts for the ER6i will work as I believe the hole is smaller on those. Then again, I also wonder if part of the problem with the Etymotic’s is precisely that they block so much ambient noise - of on and over-the-ear type headphones, ones that are open-ear generally sound much better and from what I’ve read there is reason for that. Could something similar be at play here? I don’t know.

    In any case, while I was initially disappointed in these earphones due to them not sounding nearly as good as my PX 100’s, I think that for use on the train and in other noisy environments, these are going to be a lot more satisfying than the Etymotic ER6i’s. I wish I’d caught them at the $40 initial price, but even at $60 I think these were a good purchase for me. I’m also, though, more curious than ever to know if a headphone amp would have helped the ER6i’s. In retrospect, I guess all I need to do is buy a mini-jack to full size headphone jack adapter and plug the ER6i’s into my home stereo. That should be similar to a headphone amp, yes? I plan to try this out soon - just need to find time to get to Radio Shack.

    One last note: the CX 300’s don’t come with any kind of case or pouch. As it happens, of course, I have the pouch for my ER6i’s and I’ll use that, and store the ER6i’s in a plastic bag. If you don’t have any kind of pouch or case you’re going to want to get one, so factor that into their cost.

    sjonke had this to say on Mar 09, 2006 Posts: 12
  • Now having used the CX 300’s several times on the train/bus, I’m unhappy to report that they don’t stand up, at least in stock form, in this environment. They simply don’t block very much outside noise at all. I end having to turn them up higher than I want, and if the ambient noise level increases I can miss parts of podcasts, dialog in a movie, etc, before being able to compensate, which is a nuisance. In that light, I prefer the Etymotic ER6i. However, I’ve since been told by “The Ear Plug Super Store”, that the foam eartips for the Ultimate Ears line of ear-canal phones *should* fit the Sennheiser CX 300. I’ve decided to give it a shot and ordered a set. Once I get them and have a chance to try them out I’ll report back with the results, whether or not they fit, and if so, how the CX 300 performs with them.

    sjonke had this to say on Mar 13, 2006 Posts: 12
  • I got my order of Ultimate Ears foam eartips in. As it turns out, they don’t fit as designed. I believe the narrower end should go onto the headphone so that the lip prevents the foam eartip from coming off. This smaller diameter hole is much too small for the CX 300 earphone. It is impossible to put it on this way. I do find, however, that if I turn the foam eartip backward, then it fits on and seems to hold pretty snugly in spite of not using the lip to secure it. At least it takes some effort to get it back off again. Still, doing it this way I do run the risk of an eartip coming off inside my ear, and that would be no fun, but it does seem to fit quite snugly. I will have to make it routine to check that the eartip is on all the way and is snug before inserting them.

    I may also try modifying one set, stretching or perhaps trimming somehow, the narrow-end opening, so that it can fit on properly. The foam eartips do seem to improve the sound quality of the CX 300’s, even though, being on backward, there is that narrower lip slightly blocking the path from the driver. In fact, they may actually slightly reduce the bass, but in the case of these headphones that’s a good thing. I’m not 100% sure they are doing that - it may just be that I’ve gotten use to the bass level. On the down side, they don’t block as much more outside noise as I’d hoped. My ears could use a large size foam insert, something more akin to the medium Etymotic inserts. I wish there were a set of foam inserts made for these headphones, but these will have to do unless I can find something better that works.

    I also order an Etymotic (black) shirt clip which I definitely recommend adding to the CX 300. It’s cheap, works with the CX 300 cable and quite effectively gets rid of, or at least minimizes, ear-canal phone “cable rustle”.

    sjonke had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 12
  • Just got done testing these guys. I’m listening to a recording of the Atlantic City Convention Hall’s pipe organ, Blower startup demonstration, Tocatta in D minor, Hymn: Abide With Me, and of course, the 64-foot Diaphone (8hz, I believe?) and several others. You do not get more bass than this.

    My opinion is that the ER6i actually needs a bit of air space to recreate bass properly. The tighter the seal you can get the better, of course, but it does need to be a ways from your eardrum.

    With this setup, I still find that I don’t get much bass (sorry, no scientific tests).  I’ve had the pleasure of listening to said tracks on a surround sound system with an excellent receiver and subwoofer system, and it will literally shake windows and raise the hair on your neck. It’s barely audible with the ER6i until the volume is increased to the point where recording hiss is clear. Turning on the Bass Boost equalizer does help, but it’s not a perfect fix.

    Hope that helps.

    Sallowpad had this to say on May 21, 2007 Posts: 1
  • Really a good experience: spatialization of instruments and voices is really good. Size of headphones is ok to listen to when you are laying on the pillow and isolation plays good for my wife just beside (Apple’s genuine headphones let the music be heard and was therefore disturbing).

    Freudaine had this to say on Oct 08, 2007 Posts: 1
  • I’ve owned a set of ER-6i cans for about 18 months now and used them extensively. My girlfriend bought a set of Sennheiser PX100 cans at the same time, so I’ve spent plenty of time with both.

    ER-6i: Definitely lacking in bass, despite what everyone says about a seal doing the trick. However,  everything else about their sound quality is great. If you’re into rock, grunge or punk then the ER6is may not be for you. However, they sound AWESOME when listening to classical and jazz.

    Also, the ER-6is do need burn-in time. This surprised me, as I thought it was only full-sized cans that needed burn-in. They do sound better now than they used to. Another point: The source IS important. They sound pretty anaemic on my Sandisk Sansa e200 MP3 player, but much better on my laptop computer, listening to the same MP3 tracks.

    PX100s: I much prefer these to the ER-6is when listening to rock. They have a much better soundstage and more powerful bass. However, they don’t isolate sound like the ER-6is, and I mostly listen to my MP3 player on noisy public transport, so I worry about the PX100s damaging my hearing, as I have to crank up the sound levels. Also, the PX100s do not have the clarity of the ER-6is.

    So, it’s your choice!

    newzild had this to say on Feb 22, 2008 Posts: 1
  • Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2
You need log in, or register, in order to comment