Top Three Multi-Network IM Clients

by Aaron Wright Mar 15, 2006

A few questions I had to ask people before buying my first Macintosh included, “Will I be able to use similar software that I’ve been used to on a PC?” and “Can I still talk to my friends over MSN and Yahoo?” Everyone will know the answer to both those questions already, but for a time, since migrating over to the OS X system, I was a little confused over which IM application to use, especially as I really wanted one that handled all the major networks. I didn’t fancy using Microsoft Messenger and Yahoo Messenger because they are both virtually non-customizable, have a sort of “chunky” feel to them, especially Microsoft Messenger, and are both practically featureless (although kudos to Yahoo for including web cam support).

So if you’re an IM user wanting to use various chat networks on one application, which is best? In truth, the ones listed below are all fine for chatting to friends and sending/receiving files. It’s more down to how you want your IM app to behave and what features you want. I’ll do my best to squeeze in the best of those features from each of the three applications I’ve listed below.

Adium X

 

image

View Chat Window

A brilliantly customizable IM application that supports AOL, Jabber (Google Talk etc), MSN, Yahoo, ICQ, Gadu-Gadu and Bonjour protocols and the more business aimed networks such as Lotus Sametime and Novell Groupwise.

On first download, Adium X appears to be rather boring, but underneath the hood hides a variety of excellent features and customization options that makes Microsoft Messenger incredibly jealous.

Tabbed messages allow the user to keep chat windows in one main window underneath separate tabs, and changing between conversation is a piece of cake with the  + ⇔ keys. You’re able to organize your chat windows so that different groups sit within different windows, but if you’d prefer to stick to the standard method of having multi-windows for different chat session, you can do so.

It’s possible to customize the look and feel of virtually every aspect of Adium X from contact and message styles to sound notifications and dock menus and it’s so easy to do too. A direct download and install of themes and schemes can be obtained from the official website, nearly all of which are submitted by other Adium users, allowing less time fiddling about with things and more time actually chatting.

Another two things that tickle me about Adium X is the live spell checker and OTR encryption (to stop others ‘viewing’ your messages), whilst holding a conversation with someone. The live spell check is automatic but seems localized to American-English. I’ve not yet found a way to rectify this for standard English. Web-kit message display, file transfer and communication with OS X’s address book are another three notable features available. I’m also fond of the chat history feature as that’s something I relied heavily on when previously using MSN Messenger on the PC.

The one downfall with Adium X is that there is no web cam support, neither is there an option for audio chat, two things which I crave on an IM client as I like to see my nephews every week or so growing up. Another annoyance I happened to notice is that if you’re asked to accept someone to be added to your contact list, by default, the contact isn’t added for you to view, forcing you to add the address manually, however, the contact that had originally asked to be added will still see you.

Overall, I prefer Adium X over the other two applications below. This is obviously down to personal preference, mainly because of the excellent customisation options, speed of use and ease of use.

You can download Adium X from AdiumX.com for free.

Fire

 

image

View Chat Window

Fire was the first multi-network instant messenger application for the Mac OS X platform and was praised by Apple who labeled it a ‘keystone application’ on Mac OS X 10.0. It supports connections to AOL, ICQ, Yahoo, IRC, MSN, Jabber and Bonjour.

On first install, unlike Adium X, Fire appears more sleek in design with a pleasant OS X style interface. Fire almost reminds me of Microsoft Messenger in the way everything is set out, although it is slightly more customizable and certainly a much better application.

I noticed on the official website that there are far less customizations available for Fire when compared to Adium X, but this shouldn’t put the user off from such a good application. Tabbed messages, file sharing, encryption are all available for the user, but one thing Adium X wins a brownie point for is there is no apparent live spell checker within the chat windows in Fire (again, something I want where others may not). Once more, no web cam or audio chat support for any of the protocols which is something I know will annoy many and unfortunately I don’t know the reason for this. So feel free to leave a comment and fill me in.

I found that Fire was probably more suited to users who aren’t so interested in customizing the look of their IM experience due to the fact that everything is pretty much already set up upon first use and is slightly more user friendly than Adium X. Although Adium X can be used right away, users will want to add themes and styles as soon as.

Along with most IM applications these days, Fire has a chat-history which works rather well with Spotlight.

Although not quite as flexible as Adium X, I do rate Fire highly, especially as the user interface on it is slightly better than Adium X and Proteus (see below).

You can download Fire from the Developers Website for free.

Proteus

 

image

View Chat Window

On first launch Proteus is more aesthetically appealing than Adium X, although still incredibly similar.  Along with Adium X, Proteus works seamlessly with Mac OS X’s address book as it’s able to synchronize with it keeping your contacts organized and in one place.

Users are able to customize almost every aspect of Proteus from the buddy list, chat windows, sounds etc, although not quite as much as Adium. It’s certainly similar to Adium in the way it looks and feels and the initial setup is much more user friendly giving you a pleasant guide to setting up accounts and preferences.

Again, no support for audio or web cam chat but the spell check feature, file transfers and chat history are all there. I’m surprised to see no data encryption available, something a lot of security weary folk out there may be concerned about and shockingly, the creators, Defaultware, are asking users to buy the product after an evaluation period. They nearly got me with the cute dog named Hamish (you’ll see) who asks you to register, but with the likes of Adium X and Fire, which are equally good, if not better multi-network applications, why should we be forced to purchase this product? There’s certainly nothing in it that persuades you to buy it, especially when you’ve got links to the other two applications above. Still, I’m sure a donation would be acceptable by some.

I should also probably mention that there is support for MSN, AOL, ICQ, Jabber, Yahoo, Gadu-Gadu and Bonjour protocols.

Probably my least favourite out of the three applications, although it’s still a good multi-network client to use. With the likes of Adium X and Fire about, I’m surprised anyone would buy this product. Perhaps there’s something special about it I’ve yet to discover. One thing I do give a thumbs up for is the good set-up wizard at the start which makes the application all the more user friendly.

You can download Proteus from Defaultware’s website on a limited but fully functional trial.

I hope that’s shed some light for the newer users out there as to which applications suite your needs and your comments are always welcome. I am also interested to hear what other Mac users use for a chat client, whether it be a multi-network application, the official chat applications for each network, or something else.

Digg This Article

Comments

  • Even though it’s a little buggy sometimes (still!!), iChat is IMHO still the best IM program out there.  I work with people spread out all over the country, and iChat is like our own virtual office.  At any time I can be on a video conference call with someone from California, New Mexico, and North Carolina, which is not only astonishing, it’s also quite a bit more productive than just an audio conference call.  iChat is the one for me, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.

    Jim

    http://www.humanbeingcurious.com

    Jim Caruthers had this to say on Mar 15, 2006 Posts: 13
  • Actually, Proteus is now freeware. This gives me some thoughts about the freshness/accuracy of this article.

    Jim: iChat IS cool, but it’s not enough multi-protocol to make it on the list, I think wink

    aragost had this to say on Mar 15, 2006 Posts: 1
  • And the built in spellchecker is a part of OS X.  If you right-click (ctrl+click) and select spelling -> spelling, you can change the dictionary for the whole computer’s spelcheck, which is useful if you are fed up of it trying to spell customise with a Z and colour without the u!

    I really do miss webcam/audio support in these programs.  Skype or Gizmo kind of makes up for the lack of audio, but there is still no way to talk to people with a webcam (not an iSight) using anything but the official Yahoo! Client, or iChat (but that seems to have problems interfacing with people on the AIM platform with regards video).

    brainache had this to say on Mar 15, 2006 Posts: 3
  • I do like iChat, but as Aragost mentioned, it’s hardly multi-protocol.  I think it only supports Jabber and whatever AOL and .Mac users can access, right?

    Aragost, are you sure Proteus is freeware?  When I downloaded and used I kept getting a “buy now or try” dialogue appear.  It’s the latest version as well.

    I know the built in spell checker is part of OS X, but I was referring to the ‘live spellchecker” which is only, as far as I can see, available in Adium X.  I’m talking about when you type and it lines appear under the word spelt incorrectly.

    Aaron Wright had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 104
  • Yes, the live spell checker is also a part of OS X.  I use it with Safari and VoodooPad as well.

    Tom

    bacchus1 had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 9
  • Also, you gave credit to Yahoo! for a half assed implementation of video chat and without any real updates for the mac platform.

    Tom

    bacchus1 had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 9
  • Also, you gave credit to Yahoo! for a half assed implementation of video chat and without any real updates for the mac platform.

    I am hoping Skype releases its video chat client for OS X soon.

    Tom

    bacchus1 had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 9
  • Darn it, no edit function?!

    bacchus1 had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 9
  • Tom, don’t complain, you’re getting my comments tally up wink.  I only gave credit to Yahoo on their implementation of the video chat, absolutely nothing else though as it’s a terrible terrible application.  I’d pay for something like Adium if it included video chat…*


    *I was being nice, I’d never pay for an IM client.

    Aaron Wright had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 104
  • LOL - Good luck w/ your future articles.

    London eh, I used to live there before I moved across the pond. I miss the take out food so bad - Mate, that was something you guys had mastered.

    The Chinese take out options were amazing.

    Half Pork Fried Rice & Half Chicken Fried Rice w/ Chili Sauce - mmm…..

    &

    Some of those gyro joints, I think one was called Taza or something…sighs..

    I still remember landing in Heathrow for the first time at 15 years of age and making my way into the city. I walked into a phone booth and thought I walked into heaven. Needless to say I spent a longggg time admiring the wonderful collage of artwork that decorated that phone booth wink

    Tom

    bacchus1 had this to say on Mar 16, 2006 Posts: 9
  • As a long time user of Adium, and a tiny-insignificant-portion-of-it contributor, I have to put in my voice and say Adium is the best multi-protocol chat client EVER.

    And it’s only going to get better.

    Waa had this to say on Mar 23, 2006 Posts: 110
  • A few questions I had to ask humans afore affairs my aboriginal Macintosh included pass4sure 70-663, “Will I be able to use agnate software that I’ve been acclimated to on a PC?” and “Can I still allocution to my accompany over MSN and Yahoo?” pass4sure 642-383 Everyone will apperceive the acknowledgment to both those questions already, but for a time, back brief over to the OS X system, I was a little abashed over which IM appliance to use, abnormally as I absolutely capital one that handled all the above networks. I didn’t adorned application Microsoft Messenger and Yahoo Messenger because they are both around non-customizable pass4sure 642-373, accept a array of “chunky” feel to them, abnormally Microsoft Messenger, and are both about characterless (although acclaim to Yahoo for including web cam support) pass4sure 650-177.

    Monika had this to say on Jun 12, 2010 Posts: 4
  • I have found this blog a very great resource for me and some of my friends.

    mobile prices in pakistan, used mobile prices in pakistan

    zstrmaker had this to say on Jun 30, 2011 Posts: 2
  • As a long time user of Adium, and a tiny-insignificant-portion-of-it contributor, I have to put in my voice and say Adium is the best multi-protocol chat client EVER.
    <h1>Gucci indy medium shoulder bag</h1>

    <h1>Gucci Hysteria medium tote</h1>

    <h1>Gucci Medium Backpack </h1>

    <h1>Gucci D gold medium hobo</h1>

    <h1>Gucci heritage medium tote</h1>

    <h1>Gucci vintage web medium hobo</h1>
    And it’s only going to get better.

    gucci outlet online had this to say on Aug 07, 2011 Posts: 11
  • I really loved reading your blog. It was very well authored and easy to understand. Unlike additional blogs I have read which are really not that good.
    testking 640-863|testking 1Y0-A24|testking 642-185|testking 650-177|testking 646-656|testking JN0-101|
    testking 642-982|testking 70-652|

    williamrichard611 had this to say on Aug 10, 2011 Posts: 12
  • Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >
You need log in, or register, in order to comment